Ok, I think there was already a thread made before, but since not many people had the game at the time (at least I think) there werent many replies, so I have decided to make a new thread!
Anyways, what do you guys think about Vietnam, and how does it run on your PC?
As for my thoughts about the game, it is REALLY good IMO, and easily woops BF 1942's ass! Not only are the graphics and stuff improved quite a bit, but hearing a copter fly by while it is blasting "WAR, WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR!!!???" just never seems to get old!
I have also noticed that they bumped the realism up quite a notch by not only encouraging teamwork even more than before, but also making the damage more realistic. Unlike in BF 1942 where you could take lots of shots as a medic, then run and hide, heal yourself, and return to fighting again, on this game, most of the time the first time the enemy shoots, you pretty much die unless they are a sorry shot. One shot in the head is an instantaneous kill, and more than 3 shots anywhere else is pretty much death, so with machine guns blasting everywhere, on this game, you CANNOT act like Rambo and run around shooting everyone you see. You MUST use stealth most of the time so that you can take out the enemy without them knowing your current position, and this also makes capturing flags ALOT harder than it was on '1942.
As for performance, my specs are listed below, and I am running this game at full blast on 1024x768 with everything turned on MAX. Not one bit of performance loss, and not much stuttering at all, so I am overall pleased with the way this game is running, and I have yet to figure out why so many people are complaining about performance issues.
Anyways, anyone who has played this game before, please post here and share your opinions!
This game RULES!!!!!!!!!
Anyways, what do you guys think about Vietnam, and how does it run on your PC?
As for my thoughts about the game, it is REALLY good IMO, and easily woops BF 1942's ass! Not only are the graphics and stuff improved quite a bit, but hearing a copter fly by while it is blasting "WAR, WHAT IS IT GOOD FOR!!!???" just never seems to get old!
I have also noticed that they bumped the realism up quite a notch by not only encouraging teamwork even more than before, but also making the damage more realistic. Unlike in BF 1942 where you could take lots of shots as a medic, then run and hide, heal yourself, and return to fighting again, on this game, most of the time the first time the enemy shoots, you pretty much die unless they are a sorry shot. One shot in the head is an instantaneous kill, and more than 3 shots anywhere else is pretty much death, so with machine guns blasting everywhere, on this game, you CANNOT act like Rambo and run around shooting everyone you see. You MUST use stealth most of the time so that you can take out the enemy without them knowing your current position, and this also makes capturing flags ALOT harder than it was on '1942.
As for performance, my specs are listed below, and I am running this game at full blast on 1024x768 with everything turned on MAX. Not one bit of performance loss, and not much stuttering at all, so I am overall pleased with the way this game is running, and I have yet to figure out why so many people are complaining about performance issues.
Anyways, anyone who has played this game before, please post here and share your opinions!
This game RULES!!!!!!!!!